Representing science: diversity on the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology

Author:

Evans Kenneth M1ORCID,Matthews Kirstin R W1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University , MS-40, P.O. Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251-1892, United States

Abstract

Abstract Federal advisory committees related to science and technology are important mechanisms for connecting policy-makers with independent experts and the broader public. The balance of represented expertise and viewpoints shapes a committee’s intended advisory role, consensus building processes, and the quality and impact of its policy recommendations. This paper presents the first historical analysis of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) and examines its changing balance of social and professional perspectives from 1990 to 2023. We demonstrate that PCAST’s balance has shifted to be more inclusive of different social groups and professional backgrounds over time, particularly under President Biden. We conclude with recommendations for future White House science policy advisory bodies to ensure they are adequately representative of the diversity of perspectives in the US research enterprise and the overall US population.

Funder

Center for History of Physics at the American Institutes of Physics

Richard Lounsbery Foundation

National Science Foundation

Humanities Texas, the state affiliate for the National Endowment for the Humanitieis

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference100 articles.

1. An Interview with OSTP Director Kelvin Droegemeier;Ambrose,2019

2. Press Wins Battle with PCAST over Access;Anderson;Science,1993

3. Advisory Committees in OSHA and EPA: Their Use in Regulatory Decisionmaking;Ashford;Science, Technology, & Human Values,1984

4. David Z. Beckler Letter to John H. Gibbons;Beckler,1992

5. Press Release – President-elect Biden Announces Key Members of His White House Science Team;Biden-Harris Transition,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3