Affiliation:
1. DCLPS (Duesseldorf Center for Logic and Philosophy of Science), Universitaetsstr. 1, Duesseldorf, Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Knowledge and values are the two main ingredients of public decision-making. In the past, the predominant paradigm of such decision-making was based on an approach of value-neutral science and aimed at processing both ingredients in a disentangled way. However, this approach has some theoretical and practical drawbacks, for which reason several alternative paradigms of public decision-making arose. In this paper we highlight the importance of another paradigm of such decision-making within so-called epistemic regimes. We do so against the background of the discussion of value-neutral science and provide a conceptual analysis of the notion of a regime which allows us to outline the underlying structure of re-entangling knowledge and values in epistemic regimes.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献