Gender mainstreaming research funding: a study of effects on STEM research proposals

Author:

Sjöö Karolin1ORCID,Kaltenbrunner Wolfgang2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Technology Management and Economics, Division of Science, Technology and Society, Chalmers University of Technology , Vera Sandbergs Allé 8, Gothenburg SE 41 133, Sweden

2. Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University , Kolffpad 1, 2333 BN Leiden, Leiden NL-2300 RA, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Policymakers increasingly try to steer researchers to choose topics of societal concern and to conduct research in ways that reflect such concerns. One increasingly common approach is prompting researchers to integrate certain perspectives into the content of their research, but little is known about the effects of this governance modality. We analyze 1,189 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics research proposals submitted to the Swedish Research Council which, starting in 2020, required all applicants to consider including the sex and/or gender perspectives in their research. We identify three overarching strategies upon which researchers rely (content-, performer-, and impact-centered) and analyze the ways in which researchers across disciplines motivate, through text, the inclusion or exclusion of these perspectives. Based on our findings, we discuss the scope of the desired effect(s) of a requirement of this kind.

Funder

Riksbankens Jubileumsfond

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference54 articles.

1. Concepts of Originality in the Natural Science, Medical, and Engineering Disciplines: An Analysis of Research Proposals;Barlösius;Science, Technology, & Human Values,2019

2. Evidence of Research Mastery; How Applicants Argue the Feasibility of Their Research Projects;Barlösius;Research Evaluation,2021

3. The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments;Borrás;Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2013

4. Looking across and Looking beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science;Boudreau;Management Science,2016

5. Lasting Tensions in Research Policy-Making—A Delegation Problem;Braun;Science & Public Policy,2003

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3