What governs attitudes toward artificial intelligence adoption and governance?

Author:

O’Shaughnessy Matthew R1,Schiff Daniel S2ORCID,Varshney Lav R3,Rozell Christopher J1,Davenport Mark A1

Affiliation:

1. School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology , 777 Atlantic Dr NW, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA

2. Department of Political Science , Purdue University, 110 North University St, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA

3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , 306 N Wright St MC 702, Urbana, IL 61801, USA

Abstract

Abstract Designing effective and inclusive governance and public communication strategies for artificial intelligence (AI) requires understanding how stakeholders reason about its use and governance. We examine underlying factors and mechanisms that drive attitudes toward the use and governance of AI across six policy-relevant applications using structural equation modeling and surveys of both US adults (N = 3,524) and technology workers enrolled in an online computer science master’s degree program (N = 425). We find that the cultural values of individualism, egalitarianism, general risk aversion, and techno-skepticism are important drivers of AI attitudes. Perceived benefit drives attitudes toward AI use but not its governance. Experts hold more nuanced views than the public and are more supportive of AI use but not its regulation. Drawing on these findings, we discuss challenges and opportunities for participatory AI governance, and we recommend that trustworthy AI governance be emphasized as strongly as trustworthy AI.

Funder

U.S. Department of Defense

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference97 articles.

1. AI Today, AI Tomorrow: The ARM 2020 Global AI Survey;ARM,2020

2. Evidence of Rising Rates of Inattentiveness on Lucid in 2020;Aronow,2020

3. Risk Perceptions of Men and Women Scientists;Barke;Social Science Quarterly,1997

4. Politics and Scientific Expertise: Scientists, Risk Perception, and Nuclear Waste Policy;Barke;Risk Analysis,1993

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3