Do winners pick government? How scale-up experience shapes entrepreneurs’ assessments of innovation policy mixes

Author:

Denney Steven1ORCID,Southin Travis2ORCID,Wolfe David A3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Vienna , Universitätsring 1, Vienna 1010, Austria

2. School of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton University , 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada

3. Innovation Policy Lab, Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto , 1 Devonshire Place, Toronto M5S 3K7, Canada

Abstract

AbstractHow do entrepreneurs of high-growth firms in small, open economies evaluate innovation policy mixes? In response to market consolidation by large firms, governments in such countries are using a mix of innovation policy tools to support firms with high-growth potential in digitally intensive sectors. Government objectives, however, are not being realized. Bringing actor-centric perspectives to the policy mix literature, we analyze interviews with entrepreneurs from Canadian technology firms to determine whether there is a disconnect between the objectives and instruments employed by the government. With distinct policy preferences rooted in their growth experiences specific to the country’s political economy, we find that scale-up entrepreneurs prefer a more active role of the government in the form of demand-side, direct, and targeted innovation instruments. The findings presented in this article provide a more nuanced understanding of the innovation policy landscape and the preferences of technology scale-up firms

Funder

Mitacs Canada

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference98 articles.

1. Unleashing the Growth Potential of Key Sectors;Advisory Council on Economic Growth,2017

2. The State, Business, and Industrial Change in Canada

3. The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms;Autor;The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2020

4. Intangibles and Industry Concentration: Supersize Me;Bajgar,2021

5. Impediments to Advanced Technology Adoption for Canadian Manufacturers;Baldwin;Research Policy,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3