Affiliation:
1. Swedish School of Library and Information Science (SSLIS), University of Borås , Borås SE 501 90, Sweden
Abstract
Abstract
In 2014, the European Commission initiated a process to strengthen science 2.0 as a core research policy concept. However, this turned into a substantial ideational shift. The concept of science 2.0 was dropped. Instead, open science became established as one of the three pillars of the €94 billion research framework programme Horizon Europe. This article scrutinises the official narrative regarding the shift of concepts, identifying transparency issues, specifically misrepresentation of concepts and data, and the redaction of key material. This can be characterised as problems of input legitimacy. A public consultation did take place, but numerous transparency issues can be found. From science 2.0 to open science, the ideational shift was portrayed as simply a matter of exchanging two synonymous concepts. However, science 2.0 is a descriptive concept referring to science being transformed by digitalisation. In contrast, open science involves normative assumptions about how science should work and be governed.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference61 articles.
1. Impact of Open Science Methods and Practices on the Economics of Research and Science;Adams,2015
2. Stakeholders Wanted! Why and How European Union Agencies Involve Non-state Stakeholders;Arras;Journal of European Public Policy,2018
3. The New Political Economy of the Macroprudential Ideational Shift;Baker;New Political Economy,2013
4. The Changing Demography of the EU Interest System since 1990;Berkhout;European Union Politics,2010
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献