Experts and climate change politicisation. A case study of the Environmental Protection Agency (1983–2015)

Author:

Loy Loredana1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, Cornell University , 323 Uris Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Abstract

Abstract How did governmental experts respond publicly to the politicisation of climate change in the policy domain? Did they remain neutral to this process, resisted these efforts, or enabled them? Using longitudinal data derived from a content analysis of congressional testimonies provided by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) between 1983 and 2015, I find that the proportion of climate-related advocacy statements increased over time, yet their prevalence varied with the political context. As the agency’s position-taking on the issue intensified over time, this intensity was conditional on the political context. Most importantly, the EPA experts never denied the scientific basis of climate change, not even under presidential administrations that did, and instead advocated for climate action. These findings complicate traditional conceptualisations of experts as either independent from or subservient to politics, suggesting a more complex relationship where experts attempt to respond to contentious politics while maintaining continuity in their mission.

Funder

Graduate Research Fund

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference136 articles.

1. The Micro-Politics of Worthy Homelessness: Interactive Moments in Congressional Hearings;Allahyari;Sociological Inquiry,1997

2. The EPA at 40: An Historical Perspective;Andrews;Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum,2011

3. The Unbearable Lightness of Politics: Climate Change Denial and Political Polarization;Antonio;The Sociological Quarterly,2011

4. Interest Groups, Advisory Committees, and Congressional Control of the Bureaucracy;Balla;American Journal of Political Science,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3