Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien/Vienna, Austria
2. Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
Abstract
Abstract
Along with the proliferation of digital technologies and the datafication of wider areas of people’s bodies and lives, the meaning of Personalised Medicine has shifted. In contemporary Personalised and ‘Precision’ Medicine, openness typically features in terms of calls for data sharing to ensure the availability of the very data sets required for the personalisation of diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. But there are other, more fundamental ways of considering openness in the context of Personalised and Precision Medicine that set different goals for public policy: (1) in an ontological sense, pertaining to the openness of the category of the ‘person’ in Personalised and Precision Medicine; (2) in a pluralistic sense, regarding the plurality of personal and societal perspectives and values in healthcare; and (3) in an emancipatory sense, counteracting concentrations of power around corporate actors—including consumer tech companies—in the health domain. The enhancement of public benefit and social justice and the protection of privacy are key goals for public policy in this context.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献