The meaning and enactment of openness in Personalised and Precision Medicine

Author:

Prainsack Barbara12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien/Vienna, Austria

2. Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK

Abstract

Abstract Along with the proliferation of digital technologies and the datafication of wider areas of people’s bodies and lives, the meaning of Personalised Medicine has shifted. In contemporary Personalised and ‘Precision’ Medicine, openness typically features in terms of calls for data sharing to ensure the availability of the very data sets required for the personalisation of diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. But there are other, more fundamental ways of considering openness in the context of Personalised and Precision Medicine that set different goals for public policy: (1) in an ontological sense, pertaining to the openness of the category of the ‘person’ in Personalised and Precision Medicine; (2) in a pluralistic sense, regarding the plurality of personal and societal perspectives and values in healthcare; and (3) in an emancipatory sense, counteracting concentrations of power around corporate actors—including consumer tech companies—in the health domain. The enhancement of public benefit and social justice and the protection of privacy are key goals for public policy in this context.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference50 articles.

1. The Precision Medicine Initiative: A New National Effort;Ashley;Journal of the American Medical Association,2015

2. Quantitative Human Phenotyping: The Next Frontier in Medicine;Ausiello;Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association,2014

3. Big Data in Health Care: Using Analytics to Identify and Manage High-risk and High-cost Patients;Bates;Health Affairs,2014

4. Reconciling Evidence-based Medicine and Precision Medicine in the Era of Big Data: Challenges and Opportunities;Beckmann;Genome Medicine,2016

5. Hegemony” and the Amateur Tradition in British Science;Berman;Journal of Social History,1975

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3