Ethical Considerations in Co-Authoring Research with Music Therapy Stakeholders

Author:

Devlin Kerry12,Meadows Anthony2,Johnston Morgan3,Johnston Cheryl3

Affiliation:

1. Aalborg University , Aalborg, Denmark

2. Shenandoah University , Winchester, VA, USA

3. Independent Scholar , Severna Park, MD , USA

Abstract

Abstract While stakeholders provide invaluable perspectives about music therapy, particularly through the lens of their expertise as participants in music therapy encounters, their perspectives are rarely amplified in the context of full participation in research teams. In support of stakeholder participation in music therapy research, this article introduces and explores ethical considerations related to co-authorship. These ethical considerations are approached in three ways: (1) describing how co-authorship has been undertaken with music therapy stakeholders, specifically disabled children and adults, in a range of contexts, (2) Identifying ethical considerations related to our team’s own research project (Devlin, K., Johnston, M., & Johnston, C. [2024]. Making mistakes together: therapy participant, parent, and therapist perspectives on music therapy in two different settings. Music Therapy Perspectives) with two coauthors who are also stakeholders, and (3) providing guidelines for music therapists interested in coauthoring research with stakeholders. In doing so, the importance of co-authorship as an accessible, equitable research practice is emphasized. Plain language abstract This article is about planning, doing, and writing research with people who are usually studied in music therapy research. We call this co-research. We talk about: How to keep people safe How to make decisions together How to work and write as a team If we should use our real names

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference53 articles.

1. Plain language for disability culture;Acton,2023

2. Using letter boards in client-centered music therapy: “Autistics can teach if some are ready to listen”;Ah Young Jeong;New Zealand Journal of Music Therapy,2021

3. With us and about us”: Participatory methods in research with “vulnerable” or marginalized groups;Aldridge,2019

4. When words are not enough;Bowe,1999

5. Research ethics committees and the benefits of involving people with profound and multiple learning disabilities in research;Boxall;British Journal of Learning Disabilities,2010

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3