Author:
Eckman Stephanie,Koch Achim
Abstract
Abstract
Several studies have shown that high response rates are not associated with low bias in survey data. This paper shows that, for face-to-face surveys, the relationship between response rates and bias is moderated by the type of sampling method used. Using data from Rounds 1 through 7 of the European Social Survey, we develop two measures of selection bias, then build models to explore how sampling method, response rate, and their interaction affect selection bias. When interviewers are involved in selecting the sample of households or respondents for the survey, high reported response rates can in fact be a sign of poor data quality. We speculate that the positive association detected between response rates and selection bias is because of interviewers’ incentives to select households and respondents who are likely to complete the survey.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,History,Communication
Reference68 articles.
1. Afrobarometer Network. 2017. “Afrobarometer Round 7 SUrvey Manual.” Available at http://afrobarometer.org/sites/default/files/survey_manuals/ab_r7_survey_manual_en1.pdf, accessed March 21, 2019.
2. “Wie zuverlässig ist die Verwirklichung von Stichprobenverfahren? Random Route versus Einwohnermeldeamtsstichprobe.”;Alt;ZUMA-Nachrichten,1991
3. “Two Experiments Showing the Effect of the Interviewers Racial Background on Responses to Questionnaires Concerning Racial Issues.”;Athey;Journal of Applied Psychology,1960
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献