Abstract
Abstract
Voter access has become a deeply polarized issue in American politics. It is well known that policymakers’ positions on election laws are often dictated by whether they think the laws will help their electoral interests and those of their party. But we know little about whether public opinion on election laws is similarly driven by partisan interest or is instead constrained by concerns of procedural legitimacy. To answer this question, I conduct a survey experiment that frames the issue of same-day registration (SDR) in terms of which major party it is expected to help electorally. The results provide clear evidence that both Democrats and Republicans are less likely to support SDR after being told the policy will primarily increase turnout among voters of the opposing party, but little evidence that being told SDR will benefit their own party affects opinion. These findings suggest an asymmetry in citizens’ willingness to choose partisan interest over democratic principles based on whether they perceive a rule change as benefiting the in-party or out-party.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,History,Communication
Reference24 articles.
1. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.”;Abramowitz;Electoral Studies,2016
2. “Sophisticated and Myopic? Citizen Preferences for Electoral College Reform.”;Aldrich;Public Choice,2014
3. “Voter Opinions about Election Reform: Do They Support Making Voting More Convenient?”;Alvarez;Election Law Journal,2011
4. “Does Partisan Self-Interest Dictate Support for Election Reform? Experimental Evidence on the Willingness of Citizens to Alter the Costs of Voting for Electoral Gain.”;Biggers;Political Behavior,2018
5. “Parties and Institutional Choice Revisited.”;Binder;Legislative Studies Quarterly,2006
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献