Affiliation:
1. University of Groningen , The Netherlands
Abstract
Abstract
This paper studies Francisco Suárez's defence of the possibility of causal overdetermination. I show that, according to Suárez, the main arguments against the possibility of causal overdetermination rely on (i) a flawed conception of causal dependence and (ii) a flawed ontology of action. I argue that his objections to (i) and (ii) amount to a significant challenge to his opponents’ case against the possibility of causal overdetermination.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference27 articles.
1. Quid est causa? The Debate on the Definition of ‘Cause’ in Early Jesuit Scholasticism;Capriati;Vivarium,2020
2. Another God, Chimerae, Goat-Stags, and Man-Lions;Doyle;Review of Metaphysics,1995
3. Truth and Truthmakers in Early Modern Scholasticism;Embry;Journal of the American Philosophical Association,2015