Affiliation:
1. University of Chicago and NBER
Abstract
Abstract
Is monetary policy less effective at increasing real output during periods of high volatility than during normal times? In this article, I argue that greater volatility leads to an increase in aggregate price flexibility so that nominal stimulus mostly generates inflation rather than output growth. To do this, I construct price-setting models with “volatility shocks” and show these models match new facts in CPI micro data that standard price-setting models miss. I then show that these models imply that output responds less to nominal stimulus during times of high volatility. Furthermore, because volatility is countercyclical, this implies that nominal stimulus has smaller real effects during downturns. For example, the estimated output response to additional nominal stimulus in September 1995, a time of low volatility, is 55% larger than the response in October 2001, a time of high volatility.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference29 articles.
1. “Price Setting with Menu Cost for Multi-Product Firms,”;Alvarez;Econometrica
2. “Mis-specification in Phillips Curve Regressions: Quantifying Frequency Dependence in this Relationship While Allowing for Feedback,”;Ashley
3. “Uncertainty Business Cycles—Really?,”;Bachmann
4. “Time-Varying Business Volatility, Price Setting, and the Real Effects of Monetary Policy,”;Bachmann
5. “Aggregate Implications of Lumpy Investment: New Evidence and a DSGE Model,”;Bachmann
Cited by
150 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献