Identifying and classifying goals for scientific knowledge

Author:

Boguslav Mayla R1,Salem Nourah M2,White Elizabeth K3,Leach Sonia M3,Hunter Lawrence E1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Computational Bioscience Program, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA

2. Health Informatics Program, College of Health Solutions at Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA

3. Center for Genes, Environment and Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO 80206, USA

Abstract

Abstract Motivation Science progresses by posing good questions, yet work in biomedical text mining has not focused on them much. We propose a novel idea for biomedical natural language processing: identifying and characterizing the questions stated in the biomedical literature. Formally, the task is to identify and characterize statements of ignorance, statements where scientific knowledge is missing or incomplete. The creation of such technology could have many significant impacts, from the training of PhD students to ranking publications and prioritizing funding based on particular questions of interest. The work presented here is intended as the first step towards these goals. Results We present a novel ignorance taxonomy driven by the role statements of ignorance play in research, identifying specific goals for future scientific knowledge. Using this taxonomy and reliable annotation guidelines (inter-annotator agreement above 80%), we created a gold standard ignorance corpus of 60 full-text documents from the prenatal nutrition literature with over 10 000 annotations and used it to train classifiers that achieved over 0.80 F1 scores. Availability and implementation Corpus and source code freely available for download at https://github.com/UCDenver-ccp/Ignorance-Question-Work. The source code is implemented in Python.

Funder

NIH

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference58 articles.

1. Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology

2. The ontology for biomedical investigations;Bandrowski;PLoS One,2016

3. The confidence information ontology: a step towards a standard for asserting confidence in annotations;Bastian;Database,2015

4. Inter-annotator agreement and the upper limit on machine performance: evidence from biomedical natural language processing;Boguslav;Stud. Health Technol. Inform,2017

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3