“It’s the political economy . . .!” A moment of truth for the eurozone and the EU

Author:

Dani Marco1,Chiti Edoardo23,Mendes Joana4,Menéndez Agustín José5,Schepel Harm6,Wilkinson Michael A7

Affiliation:

1. Associate Professor of Comparative Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Trento, Trento, Italy

2. Professor of Administrative Law, University of La Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy

3. Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy

4. Professor of Comparative Administrative Law, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

5. Profesor Titular, Departamento de Filosofía y Sociedad, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

6. Professor of Economic Law, Kent Law School and Brussels School of International Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom

7. Associate Professor of Law, London School of Economic and Political Science, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract The article discusses the Weiss dispute from a political economy perspective. It first sets this litigation in its wider context, namely the protracted transformation of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) over the last decade, a decade which has revealed the structural flaws in its design. It then briefly sketches the changing role of central banking, from a fixation on fighting inflation to a more recent focus on combating deflation. This helps to explain the problematic character of the Weiss rulings and the commentaries they have provoked, illustrating a general failure to consider the limits of law, the result of clinging to different parts of the EMU wreckage, on the assumption that the current constitutional framework remains viable. Finally, the article emphasizes the transformative potential of the Weiss saga. The judicial conflict lays bare the unsustainability of the present arrangements, and reveals the necessity of a choice between genuinely federal integration and coordinated dismantling of EMU.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Openness, Purposiveness, and the Realignment of the EU and the Democratic and Social Constitutional State;German Law Journal;2023-11

2. Numerical rules or political government, that is the (European) question;Comparative European Politics;2022-08-16

3. National states, transnational institutions, and hegemony in the EU;Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review;2021-10-31

4. Why Weiss? The I•CON symposium: Preface;International Journal of Constitutional Law;2021-01-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3