A prospective phase II randomized trial of proton radiotherapy vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Author:

Brown Paul D1,Chung Caroline2,Liu Diane D3,McAvoy Sarah4,Grosshans David2,Al Feghali Karine2,Mahajan Anita12,Li Jing2,McGovern Susan L2,McAleer Mary-Fran2,Ghia Amol J2,Sulman Erik P5,Penas-Prado Marta6,de Groot John F7,Heimberger Amy B8,Wang Jihong9,Armstrong Terri S6,Gilbert Mark R6,Guha-Thakurta Nandita10,Wefel Jeffrey S7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

2. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

3. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

5. Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA

6. Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

7. Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

8. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

9. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

10. Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background To determine if proton radiotherapy (PT), compared to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), delayed time to cognitive failure in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). Methods Eligible patients were randomized unblinded to PT vs IMRT. The primary endpoint was time to cognitive failure. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Results A total of 90 patients were enrolled and 67 were evaluable with median follow-up of 48.7 months (range 7.1-66.7). There was no significant difference in time to cognitive failure between treatment arms (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.45-1.75; P = .74). PT was associated with a lower rate of fatigue (24% vs 58%, P = .05), but otherwise, there were no significant differences in PROs at 6 months. There was no difference in PFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.44-1.23; P = .24) or OS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.49-1.50; P = .60). However, PT significantly reduced the radiation dose for nearly all structures analyzed. The average number of grade 2 or higher toxicities was significantly higher in patients who received IMRT (mean 1.15, range 0-6) compared to PT (mean 0.35, range 0-3; P = .02). Conclusions In this signal-seeking phase II trial, PT was not associated with a delay in time to cognitive failure but did reduce toxicity and patient-reported fatigue. Larger randomized trials are needed to determine the potential of PT such as dose escalation for GBM and cognitive preservation in patients with lower-grade gliomas with a longer survival time.

Funder

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Dr. Marnie Rose Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Neurology (clinical),Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3