Towards consistency in pediatric brain tumor measurements: Challenges, solutions, and the role of artificial intelligence-based segmentation

Author:

Familiar Ariana M12ORCID,Fathi Kazerooni Anahita1234,Vossough Arastoo51,Ware Jeffrey B6,Bagheri Sina16,Khalili Nastaran12,Anderson Hannah6,Haldar Debanjan7,Storm Phillip B412,Resnick Adam C412,Kann Benjamin H8,Aboian Mariam5,Kline Cassie9ORCID,Weller Michael10ORCID,Huang Raymond Y11,Chang Susan M12,Fangusaro Jason R13,Hoffman Lindsey M14,Mueller Sabine15,Prados Michael16ORCID,Nabavizadeh Ali61ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine (D3b), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , USA

2. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Department of Neurosurgery, , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , USA

3. AI2D Center for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , USA

4. Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , USA

5. Division of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , USA

6. Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , USA

7. Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , USA

8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | Brigham and Women’s Hospital | Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts , USA

9. Division of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , USA

10. Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich , Zurich , Switzerland

11. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts , USA

12. Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, University of California , San Francisco, California , USA

13. The Aflac Cancer Center, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and the Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta, Georgia , USA

14. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Phoenix Children’s Hospital , Phoenix, Arizona , USA

15. Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Pediatrics, University of California , San Francisco, California , USA

16. Department of Neurosurgery and Pediatrics, University of California , San Francisco, California , USA

Abstract

Abstract MR imaging is central to the assessment of tumor burden and changes over time in neuro-oncology. Several response assessment guidelines have been set forth by the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working groups in different tumor histologies; however, the visual delineation of tumor components using MRIs is not always straightforward, and complexities not currently addressed by these criteria can introduce inter- and intra-observer variability in manual assessments. Differentiation of non-enhancing tumors from peritumoral edema, mild enhancement from absence of enhancement, and various cystic components can be challenging; particularly given a lack of sufficient and uniform imaging protocols in clinical practice. Automated tumor segmentation with artificial intelligence (AI) may be able to provide more objective delineations, but rely on accurate and consistent training data created manually (ground truth). Herein, this paper reviews existing challenges and potential solutions to identifying and defining subregions of pediatric brain tumors (PBTs) that are not explicitly addressed by current guidelines. The goal is to assert the importance of defining and adopting criteria for addressing these challenges, as it will be critical to achieving standardized tumor measurements and reproducible response assessment in PBTs, ultimately leading to more precise outcome metrics and accurate comparisons among clinical studies.

Funder

The National Cancer Institute

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3