Affiliation:
1. IFREMER, Département Ecologie et Modèles pour l’Halieutique, BP 21105, Nantes Cedex 03, France
2. National Advisor – Ecosystem Sciences, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, 200 Kent Street, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaK1A 0E6
Abstract
Abstract
Rochet, M-J. and Rice, J. C. 2009. Simulation-based management strategy evaluation: ignorance disguised as mathematics? – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 754–762. Simulation-based management strategy evaluations are increasingly developed and used for science advice in support of fisheries management, along with risk evaluation and decision analysis. These methods tackle the problem of uncertainty in fisheries systems and data by modelling uncertainty in two ways. For quantities that are difficult to measure accurately or are inherently variable, variables are replaced by probability distributions, and system dynamics are simulated by Monte Carlo simulations, drawing numbers from these distributions. For processes that are not fully understood, arrays of model formulations that might underlie the observed patterns are developed, each is assumed successively, and the results of the corresponding arrays of model results are then combined. We argue that these approaches have several paradoxical features. Stochastic modelling of uncertainty is paradoxical, because it implies knowing more than deterministic approaches: to know the distribution of a quantity requires more information than only estimating its expected value. To combine the results of Monte Carlo simulations with different model formulations may be paradoxical if outcomes of concern are unlikely under some formulations but very likely under others, whereas the reported uncertainty from combined results may produce a risk level that does not occur under any plausible assumed formulation. Moreover, risk estimates of the probability of undesirable outcomes are often statements about likelihood of events that were seldom observed and lie in the tails of the simulated distributions, where the results of Monte Carlo simulation are the least reliable. These potential paradoxes lead us to suggest that greater attention be given to alternative methods to evaluate risks or management strategies, such as qualitative methods and empirical post hoc analyses.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Oceanography
Reference51 articles.
1. Incorporating Uncertainty into Fishery Models;Berkson;American Fisheries Society Symposium,2002
2. Experiences in the evaluation and implementation of management procedures;Butterworth;ICES Journal of Marine Science,1999
3. The role of harvest control laws, risk and uncertainty and the precautionary approach in ecosystem-based management;Butterworth,2003
4. Management procedures in a fishery based on highly variable stocks and with conflicting objectives: experiences in the South African pelagic fishery;Cochrane;Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries,1998
5. CSAS.
Assessment of the cod stock in northern Gulf of St Lawrence (3Pn4RS) in 2005
2006
http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/Csas/status/2006/SAR-AS2006_010_E.pdf
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献