Precision in bycatch estimates: the case of tuna purse-seine fisheries in the Indian Ocean

Author:

Amandè Monin J.1,Chassot Emmanuel1,Chavance Pierre1,Murua Hilario2,de Molina Alicia Delgado3,Bez Nicolas1

Affiliation:

1. Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR EME 212 (IRD, Ifremer, Université Montpellier 2) Avenue Jean Monnet, BP 171, 34203 Sète Cedex, France

2. AZTI-Tecnalia, Herrera Kaia, Portualde z/g, 20110 Pasaia (Gipuzkoa), Spain

3. Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Apdo. Correos 1373, 38080 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain

Abstract

Abstract Amandè, M. J., Chassot, E., Chavance, P., Murua, H., Delgado de Molina, A., and Bez, N. 2012. Precision in bycatch estimates: the case of tuna purse-seine fisheries in the Indian Ocean. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 69: . Estimating bycatch, i.e. the incidental catch of non-target marine animals and undersized individuals of target species, by raising observer data to the whole fishery is routine practice. The annual bycatch of the European tropical tuna purse-seine fishery over the period 2003–2009 was estimated at 11 590 t [95% confidence interval: (8165–15 818 t)], corresponding to 4.7% of the tuna landings. An analysis of the variability in the precision of this estimate, based on generalized linear models and Monte Carlo simulations, showed that the current sampling coverage of the tropical tuna fishery observer programme, which is 4.6% of the fishing trips, resulted in large uncertainties in bycatch estimates by species, i.e. none of the estimates have a relative root mean square error smaller than 50%. Although the overall magnitude of bycatch of the fishery appeared to be small, the current sampling coverage was insufficient to give any reliable estimate for low-occurring species, such as marine turtles, some oceanic pelagic sharks, and some billfishes. Increasing the sampling coverage would likely improve bycatch estimates. Simulation outputs were produced to help define (i) trade-offs between the priority species to be monitored, (ii) the estimation precision, (iii) expected accuracy, and (iv) the associated sampling costs.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Oceanography

Reference46 articles.

1. A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards;Alverson;FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 339,1994

2. Bycatch of the European purse seine tuna fishery in the Atlantic Ocean for the 2003–2007 period;Amandè;Aquatic Living Resources,2010

3. How much observer coverage is enough to adequately estimate bycatch?;Babcock,2003

4. Can the data from at-sea observer surveys be used to make general inferences about catch composition and discards?;Benoît;Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,2009

5. Choosing the best sampling unit and auxiliary variable for discard estimations;Borges;Fisheries Research,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3