Learning from three decades of Management Strategy Evaluation in South Africa

Author:

de Moor Carryn L12,Butterworth Douglas S12,Johnston Susan12

Affiliation:

1. Marine Resource Assessment and Management (MARAM) Group, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics , , Rondebosch, 7701 , South Africa

2. University of Cape Town , , Rondebosch, 7701 , South Africa

Abstract

Abstract South Africa is well known for being one of the first countries to implement management procedures that had been fully tested using Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE). Beginning in the early 1990s, Operational Management Procedures (OMPs) have been developed and implemented for the fisheries for seven important commercial species. Barring a few teething problems, for the first two decades, South Africa's track record of OMP implementation, with OMP-recommended catch limits being signed off by the responsible Minister without change, was exemplary. The sustainable management of some fisheries using OMPs continues without mishap, with regular reviews. However, the past decade has resulted in a number of deviations of decisions from OMP outputs following the declaration of “Exceptional Circumstances” (ECs). This occurred when a resource moved outside the range of scenarios tested at the time the OMP was developed. The reasons why ECs were declared, the methods used to recommend catch limits during ECs and whether ECs might have been avoided are reviewed. The experience gained over three decades of managing fisheries using MSE provides a basis to assess whether the highly time-intensive task of developing these OMPs has been worth the expected benefits, and to provide recommendations related to lessons learned.

Funder

South African Department of Forestry, Fisheries, and the Environment

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Oceanography

Reference61 articles.

1. Metarules and implementation: notes for discussion of the scientific issues;Basson;Committee on the Commission for the Conservation of the Southern Bluefin Tuna,2005

2. Discussion of scientific issues related to metarules and the implementation of a management procedure for southern bluefin tuna;Basson;Committee on the Commission for the Conservation of the Southern Bluefin Tuna CCSBT-MP/0404/05,2004

3. Why a management procedure approach? Some positives and negatives;Butterworth;ICES Journal of Marine Science,2007

4. Some lessons from implementing management procedures;Butterworth;Fisheries for Global Welfare and Environment, 5th World Fisheries Congress 2008,2008

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3