Calibrating ecosystem models to support ecosystem-based management of marine systems

Author:

Bentley Jacob W1ORCID,Chagaris David2,Coll Marta34,Heymans Johanna J56,Serpetti Natalia7,Walters Carl J8,Christensen Villy84

Affiliation:

1. Natural England , Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London SW1P 3JR , United Kingdom

2. IFAS Nature Coast Biological Station, University of Florida , Cedar Key, FL 32625 , United States

3. Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC) , Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 27–49, 08003 Barcelona , Spain

4. Ecopath International Initiative , Barcelona 08193 , Spain

5. European Marine Board , Jacobsenstraat 1, Oostende 8400 , Belgium

6. Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute , Oban PA37 1QA , United Kingdom

7. European Commission, Joint Research Centre , 1, 21027 Ispra VA , Italy

8. Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC V6T1Z4 , Canada

Abstract

Abstract Ecosystem models, such as Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE), provide a platform to simulate intricate policy scenarios where multiple species, pressures, and ecosystem services interact. Complex questions often return complex answers, necessitating evidence and advice to be communicated in terms of trade-offs, risks, and uncertainty. Calibration procedures for EwE, which can act as a source of uncertainty and bias in model results, have yet to be explored in a comprehensive way that communicates how sensitive model outputs are to different calibration approaches. As the EwE community has grown, multiple divergent approaches have been applied to calibrate models through the estimation of vulnerability multipliers: parameters that augment the consumption rate limits of predators. Here we explore the underlying principles of vulnerability multipliers as well as existing calibration approaches and their justification. Two case studies are presented: the first explores how vulnerability multipliers emerge based on the chosen calibration approach using simulated data, while the second takes two operational EwE models (Irish Sea and Northwest Atlantic Continental Shelf) and compares their outputs when calibrated following alternate calibration approaches. We show how calibration approaches can impact model-derived advice and provide a list of best practice recommendations for EwE calibration.

Funder

EU

Estatal de Investigación Científica

Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence

NSERC

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference77 articles.

1. Foraging arena theory;Ahrens;Fish Fisher,2012

2. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle;Akaike,1998

3. Investigating the recent decline in gadoid stocks in the west of Scotland shelf ecosystem using a foodweb model;Alexander;ICES J Mar Sci,2015

4. A multispecies extension to the Beverton and Holt theory of fishing, with accounts of phosphorus circulation and primary production;Andersen;Meddelelser fra Danmarks Fiskeri-og Havundersøgelser,1978

5. Refining fisheries advice with stock-specific ecosystem information;Bentley;Fron Mar Sci,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3