Acoustic seabed classification: current practice and future directions

Author:

Anderson John T.1,Van Holliday D.2,Kloser Rudy3,Reid Dave G.4,Simard Yvan5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, PO Box 5667, St John's, Newfoundland, CanadaA1C 5X1

2. School for Marine Science and Technology, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 706 South Rodney French Boulevard, New Bedford, MA, USA

3. CSIRO Marine Research, PO Box 1538, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia

4. Fisheries Research Services, Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Victoria Road, Aberdeen, UK

5. Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, PO Box 1000, Mont-Joli, Québec, Canada G5H 3Z4, and Université du Québec à Rimouski, 310 Allée des Ursulines, Rimouski, Québec, CanadaG5L 3A1

Abstract

Abstract Anderson, J. T., Holliday, D. V., Kloser, R., Reid, D. G., and Simard, Y. 2008. Acoustic seabed classification: current practice and future directions. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65: 1004–1011. Acoustic remote sensing of the seabed using single-beam echosounders, multibeam echosounders, and sidescan sonars combined and individually are providing technological solutions to marine-habitat mapping initiatives. We believe the science of acoustic seabed classification (ASC) is at its nascence. A comprehensive review of ASC science was undertaken by an international group of scientists under the auspices of ICES. The review was prompted by the growing need to classify and map marine ecosystems across a range of spatial scales in support of ecosystem-based science for ocean management. A review of the theory of sound-scattering from seabeds emphasizes the variety of theoretical models currently in use and the ongoing evolution of our understanding. Acoustic-signal conditioning and data quality assurance before classification using objective, repeatable procedures are important technical considerations where standardization of methods is only just beginning. The issue of temporal and spatial scales is reviewed, with emphasis on matching observational scales to those of the natural world. It is emphasized throughout that the seabed is not static but changes over multiple time-scales as a consequence of natural physical and biological processes. A summary of existing commercial ASC systems provides an introduction to existing capabilities. Verification (ground-truthing) methods are reviewed, emphasizing the difficulties of matching observational scales with acoustic-backscatter data. Survey designs for ASC explore methods that extend beyond traditional oceanographic and fisheries survey techniques. Finally, future directions for acoustic seabed classification science were identified in the key areas requiring immediate attention by the international scientific community.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Oceanography

Reference33 articles.

1. Report of the study group on acoustic seabed classification (SGASC);Anderson;ICES Fisheries Technology Committee. ICES Document CM 2006/FTC: 03, Ref. MHC, ACE, WGFAST,2006

2. Acoustic seabed classification of marine physical and biological landscapes;Anderson;ICES Cooperative Research Report,2007

3. Fractal properties of spatial distribution of intertidal benthic communities;Azovsky;Marine Biology,2000

4. The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates;Beck;Bioscience,2001

5. Verification of acoustic classes;Brown;ICES Cooperative Research Report,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3