Guidance for implementation of integrated ecosystem assessments: a US perspective-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Guidance for implementation of integrated ecosystem assessments: a US perspective

Published:2013-09-04 Issue:5 Volume:71 Page:1198-1204
ISSN:1095-9289
Container-title:ICES Journal of Marine Science
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Levin Phillip S.¹,Kelble Christopher R.²,Shuford Rebecca L.³,Ainsworth Cameron⁴,deReynier Yvonne⁵,Dunsmore Rikki⁶,Fogarty Michael J.⁷,Holsman Kirstin⁸,Howell Evan A.⁹,Monaco Mark E.¹⁰,Oakes Stephanie A.³,Werner Francisco¹¹

Affiliation:

1. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Blvd. E., Seattle, WA 98115, USA

2. NOAA Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Lab, Miami, FL, USA

3. National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology, Silver Spring, MD, USA

4. University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL, USA

5. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Regional Office, Seattle, WA, USA

6. NOAA National Ocean Service, National Marine Sanctuary Program, Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Monterey, CA, USA

7. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Woodshole, MA, USA

8. Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

9. National Marine Fisheries Service, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, Honolulu, HI, USA

10. NOAA National Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal and Ocean Science, Silver Spring, MD, USA

11. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CA, USA

Abstract

Abstract Ecosystem-based management (EBM) has emerged as a basic approach for managing human activities in marine ecosystems, with the aim of recovering and conserving marine ecosystems and the services they deliver. Integrated ecosystem assessments (IEAs) further the transition of EBM from principle to practice by providing an efficient, transparent means of summarizing the status of ecosystem components, screening and prioritizing potential risks, and evaluating alternative management strategies against a backdrop of environmental variability. In this paper, we draw upon lessons learned from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's IEA programme to outline steps required for IEA implementation. We provide an overview of the conceptual framework for IEAs, the practical constraints that shape the structure of individual IEAs, and the uses and outcomes of IEAs in support of EBM.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Oceanography

Link

http://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-pdf/71/5/1198/29148500/fst112.pdf

Reference56 articles.

1. Marine ecosystem-based management: from characterization to implementation;Arkema;Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2006

2. Cumulative impact mapping: advances, relevance and limitations to marine management and conservation, using Canada's Pacific waters as a case study;Ban;Marine Policy,2010

3. Is conservation triage just smart decision making?;Bottrill;Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2008

Cited by 109 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ecosystem risk from human use of ocean space and resources: A case study from the Norwegian coast;Ocean & Coastal Management;2024-10

2. Using Hidden Markov Models to develop ecosystem indicators from non-stationary time series;Ecological Modelling;2024-09

3. Blueprint for Blue Economy implementation;Marine Policy;2024-05

4. Scoping an Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the southern Benguela: fisheries still biggest risk;ICES Journal of Marine Science;2024-02-24

5. Ecosystem Risk from Human Use of Ocean Space and Resources: A Case Study from Norwegian Coastal Waters;2024