Relating marine ecosystem indicators to fishing and environmental drivers: an elucidation of contrasting responses

Author:

Link Jason S.1,Yemane Dawit2,Shannon Lynne J.3,Coll Marta4,Shin Yunne-Jai5,Hill Louize6,Borges Maria de Fatima6

Affiliation:

1. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA

2. Marine and Coastal Management, Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Private Bag X2, Rogge Bay 8012, Cape Town, South Africa

3. Marine Research (MA-RE) Institute, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X2, Rondebosch 7702, South Africa

4. Institute of Marine Science (ICM-CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08002 Barcelona, Spain, and Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, CanadaB3H 4J1

5. Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR 212 EME, Avenue Jean Monnet, BP 171, 34203 Sète cedex, France

6. Instituto de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar (IPIMAR/INRB), Avenida de Brasília, 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal

Abstract

Abstract Link, J. S., Yemane, D., Shannon, L. J., Coll, M., Shin, Y-J., Hill, L., and Borges, M. F. 2010. Relating marine ecosystem indicators to fishing and environmental drivers: an elucidation of contrasting responses. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67: 787–795. The usefulness of indicators in detecting ecosystem change depends on three main criteria: the availability of data to estimate the indicator (measurability), the ability to detect change in an ecosystem (sensitivity), and the ability to link the said change in an indicator as a response to a known intervention or pressure (specificity). Here, we specifically examine the third aspect of indicator change, with an emphasis on multiple methods to explore the “relativity” of major ecosystem drivers. We use a suite of multivariate methods to explore the relationships between a pre-established set of fisheries-orientated ecosystem status indicators and the key drivers for those ecosystems (particularly emphasizing proxy indicators for fishing and the environment). The results show the relative importance among fishing and environmental factors, which differed notably across the major types of ecosystems. Yet, they also demonstrated common patterns in which most ecosystems, and indicators of ecosystem dynamics are largely driven by fisheries (landings) or human (human development index) factors, and secondarily by environmental drivers (e.g. AMO, PDO, SST). How one might utilize this empirical evidence in future efforts for ecosystem approaches to fisheries is discussed, highlighting the need to manage fisheries in the context of environmental and other human (e.g. economic) drivers.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Ecology,Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Oceanography

Reference37 articles.

1. Trend analysis of indicators: a comparison of recent changes in the status of marine ecosystems around the world;Blanchard;ICES Journal of Marine Science,2010

2. The good(ish), the bad and the ugly: a tripartite classification of ecosystem trends;Bundy;ICES Journal of Marine Science,2010

3. PRIMER v6. User Manual/Tutorial;Clarke,2006

4. Testing of null hypothesis in exploratory community analyses: similarity profiles and biota-environment linkage;Clarke;Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology,2008

5. Ecosystem overfishing in the ocean;Coll;PLoS One,2008

Cited by 100 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3