Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
Abstract
Abstract
Artworks have authors. According to Christy Mag Uidhir, this simple assumption has significant consequences for the ontology of artworks. One such consequence is that artworks cannot be identified with abstract entities: if there are works of art, they are concrete entities. Therefore, one cannot create an abstract work of art. Mag Uidhir presents a novel challenge against abstract creationism, the view that certain kinds of art objects are abstract artifacts. This article has two aims. First, it provides a defense of abstract creationism against Mag Uidhir’s arguments. Second, it argues that creation, even in the case of concrete artifacts, is never purely causal: to create an artifact is to bring about the conditions on which the created object ontologically depends. I conclude that a properly developed account of creation provides a better understanding of the question of how one comes to create an artifact, be it abstract or concrete.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Music,Philosophy,Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Reference36 articles.
1. The Metaphysics of Everyday Life
2. “A Recalcitrant Problem for Abstract Creationism.”;Brock;The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,2018
3. “How to Be a Nominalist and a Fictional Realist.”;Cameron,2012
4. “Can a Musical Work be Created?”;Caplan;British Journal of Aesthetics,2004
5. Abstract Entities
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献