1. Achenbaum, W. A., (1995). Crossing frontiers: Gerontology emerges as a science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bass, S., & Ferraro, K., (2000). Gerontology education in transition: Considering disciplinary and paradigmatic evolution. The Gerontologist,40,97-106.
3. Bengtson, V. L., Parrott, T. M., & Burgess, E. O., (1996). Progress and pitfalls in gerontological theorizing. The Gerontologist,36,768-772.
4. Bengtson, V. L., Rice, C. J., & Johnson, M. L., (1999). Are theories of aging important? Models and explanations in gerontology at the turn of the century. In V. L. Bengtson & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 3–20). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
5. Biggs, S., Lowenstein, A., & Hendricks, J., (Eds.) (2003). The need for theory: Critical approaches to social gerontology. New York: Baywood Publishing Company.