Evaluating Clinic-Based Interventions to Reduce Racial Differences in Mortality Among People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the United States

Author:

Zalla Lauren C1ORCID,Cole Stephen R2,Eron Joseph J3,Adimora Adaora A23,Vines Anissa I2,Althoff Keri N1,Marconi Vincent C45,Gill M John6,Horberg Michael A7ORCID,Silverberg Michael J8ORCID,Rebeiro Peter F9,Lang Raynell6,Kasaie Parastu1,Moore Richard D10,Edwards Jessie K2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland

2. Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health

3. Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

4. Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine

5. Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University , Atlanta, Georgia

6. Department of Medicine, University of Calgary , Alberta , Canada

7. Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States , Rockville, Maryland

8. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California , Oakland

9. Department of Medicine and Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine , Nashville, Tennessee

10. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

Abstract Background Mortality remains elevated among Black versus White adults receiving human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care in the United States. We evaluated the effects of hypothetical clinic-based interventions on this mortality gap. Methods We computed 3-year mortality under observed treatment patterns among >40 000 Black and >30 000 White adults entering HIV care in the United States from 1996 to 2019. We then used inverse probability weights to impose hypothetical interventions, including immediate treatment and guideline-based follow-up. We considered 2 scenarios: “universal” delivery of interventions to all patients and “focused” delivery of interventions to Black patients while White patients continued to follow observed treatment patterns. Results Under observed treatment patterns, 3-year mortality was 8% among White patients and 9% among Black patients, for a difference of 1 percentage point (95% confidence interval [CI], .5–1.4). The difference was reduced to 0.5% under universal immediate treatment (95% CI, −.4% to 1.3%) and to 0.2% under universal immediate treatment combined with guideline-based follow-up (95% CI, −1.0% to 1.4%). Under the focused delivery of both interventions to Black patients, the Black–White difference in 3-year mortality was −1.4% (95% CI, −2.3% to −.4%). Conclusions Clinical interventions, particularly those focused on enhancing the care of Black patients, could have significantly reduced the mortality gap between Black and White patients entering HIV care from 1996 to 2019.

Funder

ViiV Healthcare

NIH

CDC

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Health Resources and Services Administration

Grady Health System

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care

Government of Alberta, Canada

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

National Cancer Institute

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

National Human Genome Research Institute

National Institute for Mental Health

National Institute on Drug Abuse

National Institute on Aging

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

National Institute of Nursing Research

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Immunology and Allergy

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Seeing life through life: Unpacking life education in intergenerational learning in China;Humanities and Social Sciences Communications;2024-08-16

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3