Clindamycin Protects Nonhuman Primates Against Inhalational Anthrax But Does Not Enhance Reduction of Circulating Toxin Levels When Combined With Ciprofloxacin

Author:

Vietri Nicholas J1,Tobery Steven A1,Chabot Donald J1,Ingavale Susham1,Somerville Brandon C1,Miller Jeremy A1,Schellhase Chris W2,Twenhafel Nancy A2,Fetterer David P3,Cote Christopher K1,Klimko Christopher P1,Boyer Anne E4,Woolfitt Adrian R4,Barr John R4,Wright Mary E5,Friedlander Arthur M67

Affiliation:

1. Division of Bacteriology, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, USA

2. Division of Pathology, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, USA

3. Division of Biostatistics, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, USA

4. National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

5. Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

6. Headquarters, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, USA

7. Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Inhalational anthrax is rare and clinical experience limited. Expert guidelines recommend treatment with combination antibiotics including protein synthesis-inhibitors to decrease toxin production and increase survival, although evidence is lacking. Methods Rhesus macaques exposed to an aerosol of Bacillus anthracis spores were treated with ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, or ciprofloxacin + clindamycin after becoming bacteremic. Circulating anthrax lethal factor and protective antigen were quantitated pretreatment and 1.5 and 12 hours after beginning antibiotics. Results In the clindamycin group, 8 of 11 (73%) survived demonstrating its efficacy for the first time in inhalational anthrax, compared to 9 of 9 (100%) with ciprofloxacin, and 8 of 11 (73%) with ciprofloxacin + clindamycin. These differences were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences between groups in lethal factor or protective antigen levels from pretreatment to 12 hours after starting antibiotics. Animals that died after clindamycin had a greater incidence of meningitis compared to those given ciprofloxacin or ciprofloxacin + clindamycin, but numbers of animals were very low and no definitive conclusion could be reached. Conclusion Treatment of inhalational anthrax with clindamycin was as effective as ciprofloxacin in the nonhuman primate. Addition of clindamycin to ciprofloxacin did not enhance reduction of circulating toxin levels.

Funder

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

National Institutes of Health

U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases

Defense Threat Reduction Agency

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Immunology and Allergy

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3