Validity and Characterization of Time to Symptom Resolution Outcome Measures in the ACTIV-2/A5401 Outpatient COVID-19 Treatment Trial

Author:

Chew Kara W1ORCID,Moser Carlee2ORCID,Yeh Eunice2,Wohl David A3,Daar Eric S4,Ritz Justin2,Javan Arzhang Cyrus5,Eron Joseph J3,Currier Judith S1,Smith Davey M6,Hughes Michael D2,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles , Los Angeles, California , USA

2. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston, Massachusetts , USA

3. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina , USA

4. Division of HIV Medicine, The Lundquist Institute, Harbor-University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center , Torrance, California , USA

5. Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health , Rockville, Maryland , USA

6. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego , La Jolla, California , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Time to symptom resolution measures were used in outpatient coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment trials without prior validation. Methods ACTIV-2/A5401 trial participants completed a COVID-19 diary assessing 13 targeted symptoms and global experience (overall COVID-19 symptoms, return to pre–COVID-19 health) daily for 29 days. We evaluated concordance of time to sustained (2 days) resolution of all targeted symptoms (TSR) with resolution of overall symptoms and return to health in participants receiving placebo. Results The analysis included 77 high-risk and 81 standard-risk participants with overall median 6 days of symptoms at entry and median age 47 years, 50% female, 82% white, and 31% Hispanic/Latino. Correlation between TSR and resolution of overall symptoms was 0.80 and 0.68, and TSR and return to health, 0.66 and 0.57 for high- and standard-risk groups, respectively. Of the high- and standard-risk participants, 61% and 79%, respectively, achieved targeted symptom resolution, of which 47% and 43%, respectively, reported symptom recurrence. Requiring >2 days to define sustained resolution reduced the frequency of recurrences. Conclusions There was good internal consistency between TSR and COVID-19–specific global outcomes, supporting TSR as a trial end point. Requiring >2 days of symptom resolution better addresses natural symptom fluctuations but must be balanced against the potential influence of non-COVID-19 symptoms. Clinical Trials Registration NCT04518410.

Funder

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Immunology and Allergy

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3