Comparative Evaluation of Commercial Test Kits Cleared for Use in Modified Two-Tiered Testing Algorithms for Serodiagnosis of Lyme Disease

Author:

Lewandrowski Elizabeth L1,Turbett Sarah E12ORCID,Nigrovic Lise E34,Klontz Erik H1,Branda John A1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts , USA

2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts , USA

3. Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts , USA

4. Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Modified 2-tiered testing (MTTT) for Lyme disease utilizes automatable, high throughput immunoassays (AHTIs) in both tiers without involving western immunoblots, offering performance and practical advantages over standard 2-tiered testing (STTT; first-tier AHTI followed by immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) western immunoblots). For MTTT, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends using AHTI test kits that have been cleared by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) specifically for this intended use. We evaluated performance of FDA-cleared MTTT commercial test kits from 3 manufacturers by comparing with STTT results. Methods We performed MTTT (total antibody AHTI with reflex to separate IgM and IgG AHTIs) using test kits from Diasorin, Gold Standard Diagnostics (GSD), and Zeus Scientific on 382 excess serum samples submitted to the clinical laboratory for routine Lyme disease serologic testing in July 2018, measuring agreement between MTTT and STTT using the κ statistic. Results Overall agreement with STTT was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], .77–.97) using Diasorin assays (almost perfect agreement), 0.80 (95% CI, .68–.93) using GSD assays (substantial agreement) and 0.79 (95% CI, .68–.90) using Zeus assays (substantial agreement). For detection of IgM reactivity, agreement between MTTT and STTT was 0.70 (.51–.90; substantial), 0.63 (95% CI, .44–.82; substantial) and 0.56 (95% CI, .38–.73; moderate), respectively. For detection of IgG reactivity, MTTT/STTT agreement was 0.73 (95% CI,.58–.88), 0.78 (95% CI, .62–.94), and 0.75 (95% CI, .60–.90), respectively (substantial agreement in all cases). Conclusions MTTT results obtained using commercial test kits from 3 different manufacturers had substantial to almost perfect agreement with STTT results overall and moderate to substantial agreement for IgM and IgG detection independently. Commercial MTTT tests can be used broadly for the diagnosis of Lyme disease.

Funder

Zeus Scientific

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference19 articles.

1. Estimating the frequency of Lyme disease diagnoses, United States, 2010–2018;Kugeler;Emerg Infect Dis,2021

2. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR): 2020 guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease;Lantos;Clin Infect Dis,2021

3. Recommendations for test performance and interpretation from the second national conference on serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,1995

4. Updated CDC recommendation for serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease;Mead;MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,2019

5. Laboratory diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis;Branda;Clin Microbiol Rev,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3