Catch Effectiveness Revealed by Site-Related Differences in Capture–Mark–Recapture Methods: A Butterfly Metapopulation Study

Author:

Adamski Paweł1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Nature Conservation Polish Academy of Sciences , al Mickiewicza 33, 31-120 Kraków , Poland

Abstract

Abstract Understanding metapopulation structures is very important in the context of ecological studies and conservation. Crucial in this respect are the abundances of both the whole metapopulation and its constituent subpopulations. In recent decades, capture–mark–recapture studies have been considered the most reliable means of calculating such abundances. In butterfly studies, individual insects are usually caught with an entomological net. But the effectiveness of this method can vary for a number of reasons: differences between fieldworkers, in time, between sites etc. This article analyses catch effectiveness data with respect to two subpopulations of the Apollo butterfly (Parnassius apollo) metapopulation in the Pieniny National Park (Polish Carpathians). The results show that this parameter varied significantly between sites, probably because of differences in microrelief and plant cover. In addition, a method is proposed that will include information on catch effectiveness for estimating the sizes of particular subpopulations and will help to elucidate the structure of the entire metapopulation.

Funder

Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Insect Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference49 articles.

1. Sex ratio of Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)—facts and artifacts;Adamski;Eur. J. Entomol.,2004

2. Habitat preferences and breeding biology of the clouded Apollo Parnassius mnemosyne and consequences for the species conservation;Adamski;Studia Nat.,2012

3. The long-term effect of over-supplementation on recovered populations: why restraint is a virtue;Adamski;Oryx,2022

4. Effectiveness of population recovery projects based on captive breeding;Adamski;Biol. Conserv.,2007

5. Simple capture-recapture models permitting unequal catchability and variable sampling effort;Agresti;Biometrics,1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3