Abstract
Abstract
Lou and Shu decompose Amihud’s illiquidity measure (ILLIQ) proposing that its component, the average of inverse dollar trading volume (IDVOL), is sufficient to explain the pricing of illiquidity. Their decomposition misses a component of ILLIQ that is related to illiquidity. We find that this component affects stock returns significantly, both in the cross-section and in time-series. We show that the ILLIQ premium is significantly positive after controlling for mispricing, sentiment, and seasonality. In addition, the aggregate market ILLIQ outperforms market IDVOL in estimating the effect of market illiquidity shocks on realized stock returns.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference52 articles.
1. A simple estimation of bid-ask spreads from daily close, high and low prices;Abdi,;Review of Financial Studies,2017
2. Asset pricing with liquidity risk,;Acharya,;Journal of Financial Economics,2005
3. Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time series effects;Amihud,;Journal of Financial Markets,2002
4. The illiquidity premium: International evidence;Amihud,;Journal of Financial Economics,2015
5. Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread;Amihud,;Journal of Financial Economics,1986
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献