Modern Slavery and the Punitive–Humanitarian Complex

Author:

Carvalho Henrique1ORCID,Foreman Sally2,Tawfic Simon1ORCID,Aliverti Ana1ORCID,Chamberlen Anastasia1ORCID,Rawson Belinda1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL , UK

2. Independent Scholar , London , UK

Abstract

Abstract This paper provides a critical analysis of modern slavery (MS) policy, legislation and discourse in the United Kingdom. Challenging the suggestion that recent attempts to dilute protections and guarantees in the original MS framework represent a fundamental shift from a more humanitarian to a more punitive orientation, it argues that these two moments ought to be understood as products of a single, underlying articulation, the ‘punitive–humanitarian complex’. We first explore the context and discourse of the MS agenda, exposing an ambivalence within its core tenets, primarily manifested through the dichotomy between victims (slaves) and offenders (slavers). The paper then examines how the punitive–humanitarian complex engenders moral and affective economies and reflects on how it reveals the vulnerability of contemporary state power.

Funder

Leverhulme Trust

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference98 articles.

1. ‘Affective Economies’;Ahmed;Social Text,2004

2. ‘Enlisting the Public in the Policing of Immigration’;Aliverti;British Journal of Criminology,2015

3. ‘Benevolent Policing? Vulnerability and the Moral Pains of Border Controls’;The British Journal of Criminology,2020

4. ‘Law in the Margins: Economies of Illegality and Contested Sovereignties’;The British Journal of Criminology,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3