Validation of the adapted female sexual function index among Chinese cisgender heterosexual women and sexual and gender minority women

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) remains the most widely used scale for assessing female sexual function. However, while an adapted version of the FSFI has been proven to be suitable for Western sexual minority women, it has yet to be used in China.AimThis study aimed to validate the Mandarin Chinese version of the adapted FSFI among Chinese cisgender heterosexual women and sexual and gender minority women, and evaluate its psychometric properties.MethodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted. The modified scoring method related to zero responses was examined, and structural validity, internal consistency, internal reliability, convergent validity, and known-group validity were evaluated.OutcomesThe primary measure was the adapted FSFI, and the Positive Sexuality Scale and the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale–Short Form were used to test convergent validity.ResultsA total of 431 Chinese adult women were recruited, including 193 cisgender heterosexual women and 238 sexual and gender minority women. Confirmatory factor analysis using the original scores supported the original 6-factor model. Using both Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω, the results showed that the values of the total scale and 6 subscales were in the 0.76 to 0.98 and 0.83 to 0.98 ranges, respectively, indicating satisfactory reliability. Moderate-to-strong correlations among the total FSFI scores and positive sexuality and sexual satisfaction were found (r = 0.32-0.71), supporting good convergent validity.Clinical ImplicationsThe adapted FSFI facilitates the use of more inclusive language in the clinical setting, allowing for a more comprehensive and unbiased assessment of sexual function in all women.Strengths and LimitationsThis study recruited both cisgender women of varied sexual orientations and gender minorities who were assigned female at birth, demonstrating that the adapted FSFI could be suitably applied to sexual minority populations. However, from a fully inclusive perspective of sex and gender, there is no research on how to accurately evaluate transgender women with female external genitalia or appropriately assess those with a female reproductive system but who do not self-identify as female. Therefore, more in-depth research is needed to further revise the FSFI for better use in the wider female population.ConclusionThis Chinese version of the adapted FSFI has good psychometric properties and is a reliable and valid instrument to assess female sexual function. Furthermore, the modified scoring method could be an effective alternative among samples of sexually inactive women.