Affiliation:
1. California Institute of Integral Studies , San Francisco, CA 94103, United States
2. University of Memphis , Memphis, TN 38104, United States
3. MOJO Pelvic Health , Memphis, TN 38104, United States
4. Emory University , Atlanta, GA 30322, United States
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundDespite a growing body of research on genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD), few studies have examined racial and ethnic differences.AimThe goal of this study was to examine differences across racial groups pertaining to GPPPD with sexual vaginal intercourse in young college women at 2 public US universities.MethodsData were collected from 1197 students from 2 public US universities. We limited our sample to 667 sexually active participants aged ≥18 years (mean, 19.21). Participants responded to survey items on their sexual history, wellness, and practices and to the Female Sexual Function Index. Data were analyzed through standard bivariate and regression analyses.OutcomesParticipants were asked, “In general, do you feel pain with sexual intercourse?” and categorized into 1 of 3 pain groups: occasional (10%-25% of the time), frequent (≥50%), and no pain (<10%).ResultsGPPPD was prevalent among young college women, with 162 (24.3%) reporting pain occasionally, 119 (17.8%) frequently, and 386 (57.9%) never or very seldom. While there were no differences in pain between Latina and non-Latina participants, our analysis indicated that pain was significantly higher among all other minoritized racial groups as compared with White women but particularly high in Black women, who had 2.15-higher odds of reporting pain than White women. Differences persisted when adjusting for socioeconomic status. Specific descriptors for pain sensation were more aligned with traditional descriptors of GPPPD (eg, burning, stinging, cramping, and pinching) in the White sample than among participants of color. Pain intensity did not differ among racial groups. We also found that a significant number of participants, particularly Black women, reported experiencing painful sex occasionally. No differences were noted across racial groups when assessing sexual function with the Female Sexual Function Index.Clinical ImplicationsExisting surveys and physician intake forms should be critically examined for usability with patients of color. As evidenced, Black women’s GPPPD seems to go underdetected/undetected by current measures.Strengths and LimitationsThis study is the first to explicitly compare racial differences among adolescents/young adults. The most notable limitation is the reliance on participant self-report and the absence of gynecologic examination to determine pain-contributing etiologies.ConclusionPainful intercourse affects young Black women at a higher rate than White women. Further research is needed into categories and metrics that capture their experiences of pain.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Urology,Reproductive Medicine,Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference16 articles.
1. Exploring relationships between genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder, sex guilt, and religiosity among college women in the US;Azim;J Sex Med.
2. How young does vulvo-vaginal pain begin? Prevalence and characteristics of dyspareunia in adolescents;Landry;J Sex Med.,2009
3. Definitions/epidemiology/risk factors for sexual dysfunction;Lewis;J Sex Med.,2010
4. Factors associated with vulvodynia incidence;Reed;Obstet Gynecol.,2014
5. A population-based assessment of chronic unexplained vulvar pain: have we underestimated the prevalence of vulvodynia?;Harlow;J Am Med Womens Assoc.,2003