Racialized differences across experiences and measurements of pain in genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder

Author:

Azim Katharina A1,Happel-Parkins Alison2,Moses Amy3,Haardoerfer Regine4

Affiliation:

1. California Institute of Integral Studies , San Francisco, CA 94103, United States

2. University of Memphis , Memphis, TN 38104, United States

3. MOJO Pelvic Health , Memphis, TN 38104, United States

4. Emory University , Atlanta, GA 30322, United States

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDespite a growing body of research on genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD), few studies have examined racial and ethnic differences.AimThe goal of this study was to examine differences across racial groups pertaining to GPPPD with sexual vaginal intercourse in young college women at 2 public US universities.MethodsData were collected from 1197 students from 2 public US universities. We limited our sample to 667 sexually active participants aged ≥18 years (mean, 19.21). Participants responded to survey items on their sexual history, wellness, and practices and to the Female Sexual Function Index. Data were analyzed through standard bivariate and regression analyses.OutcomesParticipants were asked, “In general, do you feel pain with sexual intercourse?” and categorized into 1 of 3 pain groups: occasional (10%-25% of the time), frequent (≥50%), and no pain (<10%).ResultsGPPPD was prevalent among young college women, with 162 (24.3%) reporting pain occasionally, 119 (17.8%) frequently, and 386 (57.9%) never or very seldom. While there were no differences in pain between Latina and non-Latina participants, our analysis indicated that pain was significantly higher among all other minoritized racial groups as compared with White women but particularly high in Black women, who had 2.15-higher odds of reporting pain than White women. Differences persisted when adjusting for socioeconomic status. Specific descriptors for pain sensation were more aligned with traditional descriptors of GPPPD (eg, burning, stinging, cramping, and pinching) in the White sample than among participants of color. Pain intensity did not differ among racial groups. We also found that a significant number of participants, particularly Black women, reported experiencing painful sex occasionally. No differences were noted across racial groups when assessing sexual function with the Female Sexual Function Index.Clinical ImplicationsExisting surveys and physician intake forms should be critically examined for usability with patients of color. As evidenced, Black women’s GPPPD seems to go underdetected/undetected by current measures.Strengths and LimitationsThis study is the first to explicitly compare racial differences among adolescents/young adults. The most notable limitation is the reliance on participant self-report and the absence of gynecologic examination to determine pain-contributing etiologies.ConclusionPainful intercourse affects young Black women at a higher rate than White women. Further research is needed into categories and metrics that capture their experiences of pain.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Urology,Reproductive Medicine,Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference16 articles.

1. Exploring relationships between genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder, sex guilt, and religiosity among college women in the US;Azim;J Sex Med.

2. How young does vulvo-vaginal pain begin? Prevalence and characteristics of dyspareunia in adolescents;Landry;J Sex Med.,2009

3. Definitions/epidemiology/risk factors for sexual dysfunction;Lewis;J Sex Med.,2010

4. Factors associated with vulvodynia incidence;Reed;Obstet Gynecol.,2014

5. A population-based assessment of chronic unexplained vulvar pain: have we underestimated the prevalence of vulvodynia?;Harlow;J Am Med Womens Assoc.,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3