Sexual growth and destiny beliefs: Longitudinal associations with dyadic coping among couples seeking medically assisted reproduction

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMedically assisted reproduction is a vulnerable time for couples’ sexual health. Believing that sexual challenges can be worked through (i.e., sexual growth beliefs) or that these challenges indicate incompatibility (i.e., sexual destiny beliefs) may be related to dyadic coping—the strategies couples use to cope—with the physical and psychological stressors of medically assisted reproduction.AimIn the current study we aimed to examine the longitudinal associations between typical (i.e., average) levels of sexual growth and destiny beliefs and positive and negative facets of dyadic coping and how greater than typical levels of these constructs predicted each other across time.MethodsCouples (n = 219) seeking medically assisted reproduction were recruited for an online longitudinal, dyadic study.OutcomesCouples completed online measures of sexual growth and destiny beliefs and positive and negative dyadic coping at baseline, 6-and 12-months.ResultsRandom intercept cross-lagged panel models demonstrated that at the within-person level, reporting higher sexual growth beliefs at baseline, relative to their average across time points, was associated with lower negative dyadic coping at 6 months. Higher negative dyadic coping at 6 months, relative to their average, was linked to lower sexual growth beliefs at 12-months. When individuals reported higher sexual destiny beliefs at 6-months, relative to their average, they and their partners reported higher negative dyadic coping at 12 -months. At the between-person level, higher overall levels of sexual destiny beliefs were related to higher overall levels of negative dyadic coping. No associations with positive dyadic coping were identified.Clinical ImplicationsCouples may benefit from identifying and reducing unhelpful beliefs about sex and negative dyadic coping.Strengths and LimitationsStrengths of this study include our large, inclusive sample, engagement of community partners, and novel analytical approach to assess change over time. However, following couples in 6-month increments and not using questionnaires specific to medically assisted reproduction may have limited our ability to detect nuanced changes that couples experience during this time.ConclusionLower sexual growth and higher sexual destiny beliefs may promote couples’ engagement in less adaptive coping behaviors as they seek medically assisted reproduction.