Understanding decision-making for and against oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery as an alternative to a mastectomy in early breast cancer: UK ANTHEM qualitative study

Author:

Davies Charlotte1ORCID,Conefrey Carmel2,Mills Nicola2,Fairbrother Patricia3,Holcombe Chris4,Whisker Lisa5,Skillman Joanna6,White Paul7,MacMillan Douglas5,Comins Charles8,Hollingworth William2ORCID,Potter Shelley910ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School , Bristol , UK

2. Population Health sciences, Bristol medical School , Bristol , UK

3. Independent Cancer Patients Voice (ICPV) , Bristol , UK

4. Linda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital , Liverpool , UK

5. Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust , Nottingham , UK

6. Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust , Coventry , UK

7. Applied Statistics Group, University of the West of England , Bristol , UK

8. University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust , Bristol , UK

9. Bristol Surgical and Perioperative Care Complex Intervention Collaboration, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building , Southmead Hospital, Bristol , UK

10. Bristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital , Bristol , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery may allow women with early breast cancer to avoid a mastectomy, but many women undergo more extensive surgery, even when breast-conserving options are offered. The aim of the ANTHEM qualitative study was to explore factors influencing women’s surgical decision-making for and against oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of women who had received either oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery or a mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction to explore their rationale for procedure choice. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Trial registration number: ISRCTN18238549. Results A total of 27 women from 12 centres were interviewed. Out of these, 12 had chosen oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery and 15 had chosen a mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Overwhelmingly, women's decisions were guided by their surgical teams. Decision-making for and against oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery was influenced by three key inter-related factors: perceptions of oncological safety; the importance of maintaining/restoring femininity and body image; and practical issues. Oncological safety was paramount. Women who reported feeling reassured that oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery was oncologically safe were happy to choose this option. Those who were not reassured were more likely to opt for a mastectomy, as a perceived ‘safer’ option. Most women wished to maintain/restore femininity, with the offer of immediate breast reconstruction essential to make a mastectomy an acceptable option. Practical issues such as the perceived magnitude of the surgery were a lesser concern. Conclusion Decision-making is complex and heavily influenced by the surgical team. High-quality, accurate information about surgical options, including appropriate reassurance about the short- and long-term oncological safety of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery is vital if women are to make fully informed decisions.

Funder

Association of Breast Surgery

Above and Beyond Charities

National Institute for Health Research

Biomedical Research Centre

University Hospitals Bristol

Weston NHS Foundation Trust

University of Bristol

Royal College of Surgeons of England Bristol Surgical Trials Centre

NIHR Clinician Scientist

UK National Health Service

Department of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3