Disease-specific survival outcomes for patients after locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: observational cohort study

Author:

Wang Sabrina M1,Li Yan2,Nash Amanda3,Ren Yi2,Thomas Samantha M24,Francescatti Amanda B5,Barber Anne5,Lynch Thomas3,Frank Elizabeth S6,Grimm Lars J7ORCID,Thompson Alastair M8,Partridge Ann H6,Hyslop Terry9,Hwang E Shelley3,Ryser Marc D1011

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA

2. Duke Cancer Institute Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina , USA

3. Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina , USA

4. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina , USA

5. Cancer Programs, American College of Surgeons , Chicago, Illinois , USA

6. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, Massachusetts , USA

7. Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina , USA

8. Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, Texas , USA

9. Division of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

10. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina , USA

11. Department of Mathematics, Duke University , Durham North Carolina , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Breast-conserving surgery alone, breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiation treatment, and mastectomy are guideline-concordant treatments for ductal carcinoma in situ. The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes between these treatment options. Methods A stratified random sample of patients diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ between 2008 and 2014 was selected from 1330 sites in the USA. Data on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up were abstracted by local cancer registrars. Population-averaged marginal estimates of disease-specific survival and overall survival for breast-conserving surgery alone, breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment, and mastectomy were obtained by combining sampling and overlap weights. Results A total of 18 442 women were included, with a median follow-up of 67.8 (interquartile range 46.1–93.5) months. A total of 35 women died from breast cancer, at a median age of 62 (interquartile range 50–74) years. Population-averaged 8-year rates of disease-specific survival were 99.6% or higher for all treatment groups, with no significant differences between groups (breast-conserving surgery alone versus breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment, HR 1.19 (95% c.i. 0.29 to 4.85); and mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment, HR 1.74 (95% c.i. 0.53 to 5.72). There was no difference in overall survival between the patients who underwent a mastectomy and the patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment (HR 1.09 (95% c.i. 0.83 to 1.43)). Patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery alone had lower overall survival compared with the patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment (HR 1.29 (95% c.i. 1.00 to 1.67)). This survival difference vanished for all but one subgroup, namely patients less than 65 years (HR 1.86 (95% c.i. 1.15 to 3.00)). Conclusion There was no statistically significant difference in disease-specific survival between women operated with breast-conserving surgery alone, breast-conserving surgery with radiation treatment, or mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ. Given the low absolute risk of disease-specific mortality, these results provide confidence in offering individualized locoregional treatment without fear of compromising survival.

Funder

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

PCA

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3