Iterated Admissibility does not Refine Extensive-form Rationalizability

Author:

Catonini Emiliano1

Affiliation:

1. New York University Shanghai , China

Abstract

Abstract I show that, in an extensive-form game, the outcomes that are consistent with iterated admissibility (i.e., with the iterated elimination of weakly dominated strategies) need not be consistent with extensive-form rationalizability.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference13 articles.

1. On rationalizability in extensive games;Battigalli;Journal of Economic Theory,1997

2. Strong belief and forward induction reasoning;Battigalli;Journal of Economic Theory,2002

3. The power of paradox: Some recent developments in interactive epistemology;Brandenburger;International Journal on Game Theory,2007

4. Admissibility in games;Brandenburger;Econometrica,2008

5. The order independence of iterated dominance in extensive games;Chen;Theoretical Economics,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3