Validity and reliability of the ERSA questionnaire in Turkish

Author:

Öztürk Hüseyin12ORCID,Karabulut Mustafa34,Baydan-Aran Mine12,Tokgöz-Yılmaz Suna12

Affiliation:

1. Audiology Balance and Speech Disorders Unit , Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, , Ankara , Türkiye

2. Ankara University , Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, , Ankara , Türkiye

3. Division of Balance Disorders , Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, , Maastricht , The Netherlands

4. Maastricht University Medical Center , Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, , Maastricht , The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract This methodological study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Evaluation of the Impact of Hearing Loss in Adults (ERSA) questionnaire for individuals with treated hearing loss. The study involved 200 participants, and both exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to examine structural validity. External validity was assessed by correlating ERSA scores with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB). Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. The Turkish ERSA demonstrated strong psychometric properties, with significant correlations between APHAB and ERSA scores and excellent internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The findings suggest that the Turkish ERSA is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating the impact of hearing loss in individuals.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference31 articles.

1. Evaluation of the impact of hearing loss in adults: Validation of a quality of life questionnaire;Ambert-Dahan;European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases,2018

2. An introduction to the analysis of models with unobserved variables;Carmines;Political Methodology,1983

3. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): A review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues;Churruca;Health Expectations,2021

4. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology;Cicchetti;Psychological Assessment,1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3