Critical Practices Adopted by Minority Group Social Workers Working in the Third Sector

Author:

Mahajne Ibrahim1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Social Work Department, Zefat Academic College, & Beit Berl Academic College , Zefat, Israel

Abstract

Abstract The research traces the adoption of critical practices by minority group social workers working in the third sector. A phenomenological approach was employed, drawing data from semi-structured in-depth interviews with social workers from two entities composing the third sector in Arab society in Israel: dozens of volunteers from the religious Zakat committees and a large proportion (the statistics are confidential) of those employed in the secular battered women’s shelters. It was found that critical practice is context-dependent: operatively, management in both entities, religious and secular, provides conditions enabling their employees to adopt critical practices such as: decreasing workloads to a minimum; permitting maximal application of professional discretion; freeing time for direct intervention; encouraging collaborative relations with service users and learning from successes during the interventions. These social workers apply minor, daily but incremental critical practices, selecting underprivileged, excluded target populations, setting intervention goals opposing the oppressors while recognising abused women (giving voice and visibility) and redistributing material resources for the needy, employing intervention methods that see distress as a structural product, standing by their applicants and encouraging change. Structural, oppositional and activist critical practice fits the social work profession when overshadowed by ‘government failure’ in general, especially among minorities.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Reference39 articles.

1. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Braun;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

2. A cross-sector comparison of motivation-related concepts in for profit and not- for-profit service organizations;De Cooman;Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,2011

3. Feminist Social Work Theory and Practice

4. Data analysis in qualitative research: A proposal for four guiding principles;Dushnik;Research Trails,2011

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3