Care Order Decisions—in the Domain of Social Work or the Courts? Social Workers’ Frontline Views

Author:

Enroos Rosi1,Huhtanen Raija2,Korpinen Johanna,Pösö Tarja1,Välikoski Tuula-Riitta3

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University , 33014 Tampere, Finland

2. Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University , 33014 Tampere, Finland

3. Faculty of Information Technology and Communication, Tampere University , 33014 Tampere, Finland

Abstract

Abstract This article examines social workers’ views on care order decisions in Finnish child welfare where the decision-making procedure takes place in either the social work or court domain depending on the parties’ consent or objection to the care order proposal. Exploring this parallel decision-making system provides insights into the less studied characteristics of non-adversarial decision-making compared with those of adversarial decision-making. Based on the interviews of twenty-nine social workers, the findings present a binary view of social workers: the court domain is mainly seen as being an arena for the legal safety for families whereas the social work domain is a psychosocial, fluent and smooth arena for making care order decisions important to family members. The study points out potential misuse of the social work domain. Additional safeguards are suggested to complement the existing legal, professional and ethical safeguards as well as the re-evaluation of the role and nature of consent as a divider of the decision-making procedures.

Funder

Academy of Finland

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Reference40 articles.

1. The formalized framework for decision making in child protection care orders: A cross-country comparison;Berrick;Journal of European Social Policy,2015

2. International perspectives on child-responsive courts;Berrick;The International Journal of Children’s Rights,2018

3. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Braun;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

4. The rights of the child in voluntary care in Ireland: A call for reform in law, policy and practice;Brennan;Children and Youth Services Review,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3