Research End-User Perspectives about Using Social Work Research in Policy and Practice

Author:

Tilbury Clare1ORCID,Hughes Mark2,Bigby Christine3ORCID,Fisher Mike4

Affiliation:

1. School of Human Services and Social Work, Griffith University, Meadowbrook QLD 4131, Australia

2. School of Arts and Social Sciences, Southern Cross University, Coolangatta QLD 4225, Australia

3. Living With Disability Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora VIC 3086, Australia

4. Tilda Goldberg Centre for Social Work and Social Care, University of Bedfordshire, University Square, Luton LU1 3JU, UK

Abstract

Abstract Research funding and assessment initiatives that foster engagement between researchers and research end-users have been adopted by governments in many countries. They aim to orient research towards achieving measurable impacts that improve economic and social well-being beyond academia. This has long been regarded as important in social work research, as it has in many fields of applied research. This study examined research engagement and impact from the perspective of research end-users working in human services. In-person or telephone interviews were conducted with forty-three research end-users about how they used research and interacted with researchers. Content analysis was undertaken to identify engagement strategies and thematic coding was employed to examine underpinning ideas about research translation into practice. Participants were involved in many types of formal and informal research engagements. They viewed research translation as a mutual responsibility but indicated that researchers should do more to improve the utility of their research for industry. The findings highlight the iterative nature of engagement and impact and raise questions about the infrastructure for scaling up impact beyond relationships between individual researchers and their industry partners.

Funder

Australian Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Reference32 articles.

1. ISRIA statement: Ten-point guidelines for an effective process of research impact assessment;Adam;Health Research Policy and Systems,2018

2. Knowledge mobilisation and the social sciences: Dancing with new partners in an age of austerity;Bannister;Contemporary Social Science,2013

3. Conceptualizing inclusive research with people with intellectual disability;Bigby;Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,2014

4. Implementation of active support over time in Australia;Bigby;Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3