Negotiating Access to Hard-to-Reach Populations through Institutional Gatekeepers in Social Work Research

Author:

Gřundělová Barbora1ORCID,Broskevičová Zuzana1,Kowolová Iveta1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Work, Faculty of Social Studies, University of Ostrava , Ostrava 702 00, the Czech Republic

Abstract

Abstract Institutional gatekeepers play an increasingly important role in social work research, and their involvement in the research process is essential for the development of a usable knowledge base. This article explores the experience of recruiting participants through institutional gatekeepers for research on hard-to-reach populations in social work. The article aims to find out how researchers negotiate access to research participants with institutional gatekeepers. A qualitative research strategy was used to accomplish this goal. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews with researchers revealed that the researchers enter into negotiations with institutional gatekeepers with some idea of the challenges and risks, but in part they enter into the unknown and are forced to make situational assessments in joint interactions. Research evolves and transforms based on how the researcher moves through the research process, what types of gatekeepers the researcher seeks at different stages of the research process and for what purpose. We identified three basic forms of negotiating access with institutional gatekeepers: logistical assistance, barter transaction and trust-based collaboration. This article looks at the different kinds of relationships that exist between researchers, gatekeepers and hard-to-reach population. It examines the power dynamics involved in the recruitment of marginalised groups through gatekeepers in social work research.

Funder

Student Grand Competition

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference31 articles.

1. Disrupting professional practices with research-driven intervention. Researcher–gatekeeper negotiations in the context of targeted youth services;Aaltonen;Qualitative Social Work,2019

2. ‘Sampling “hard to reach” populations in qualitative research: The case of incarcerated youth’;Abrams;Qualitative Social Work,2010

3. Re-examining relationships between experience, knowledge, ideas and research: A key role for recipients of state welfare and their movements;Beresford;Social Work & Society,2010

4. Gatekeepers and the social control of social research;Broadhead;Social Problems,1976

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3