Bridge over Troubled Water—Closing the Research–Practice Gap in Social Work

Author:

Denvall Verner1ORCID,Skillmark Mikael2

Affiliation:

1. School of Social Work, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

2. School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Since starting over a hundred years ago social work has been occupied with the division into academic and practical knowledge. A common theme in scientific journals of social work is how this gap can be understood and resolved. The initial purpose of this article was to carry out a systematic review to find out if and how the gap could be bridged. Because few independent studies could be found, the study instead took the form of a scoping review with more included articles. The results show concrete suggestions as to how to bridge the gap, but also three discourses with dissimilar problem definitions and solutions. The emergence of proposals such as the evidence-based practice and its diverse combinations, the formation of new institutions, and today’s globalisation triggers this fragmentation. The consequences are vast confusions of opinions and explanations which illustrate competing knowledge positions. The authors propose that researchers and practitioners should orient themselves in this landscape when building bridges between academia and practice. Instead of taking the research–practice gap for granted, they suggest that social work should relate more closely to these three discourses.

Funder

Linnaeus University

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Reference67 articles.

1. Using a collaboratory model to translate social work research into practice and policy;Allen-Meares;Research on Social Work Practice,2005

2. Reforming social services: The institutional and organizational context of the HUSK program;Andreassen;Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work,2015

3. The role of an intermediary organization in promoting research in schools of social work: The case of the Bay Area Social Services Consortium;Anthony;Social Work Research,2008

4. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework;Arksey;International Journal of Social Research Methodology,2005

5. Relationships and the research process: Participatory action research and social work;Barbera;Journal of Progressive Human Services,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3