Gambling Harms in Adult Social Care: Developing an ‘Introductory’ Question to Identify Gambling Harms Among Service Users

Author:

Forward Cat1ORCID,Norrie Caroline1ORCID,Bramley Stephanie2,Riley Liz3,Shearer James4,Finch Emily4,Stewart Glenn5,Fletcher Paul5,Manthorpe Jill6ORCID,Wardle Heather7

Affiliation:

1. NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce Research Unit, The Policy Institute, King’s College London , London WC2B 6LE, UK

2. Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK

3. Research and Evaluation, Betknowmore UK , London EC1N 8QP, UK

4. King’s Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London , London WC2B 6LE, UK

5. Enfield Council,Civic Centre , Enfield EN1 3XA, UK

6. Department of Social Work, King’s College London , London WC2B 6LE, UK

7. Lord Kelvin Adam Smith Reader in Social Sciences, University of Glasgow , Glasgow G12 8RS, UK

Abstract

Abstract Gambling harms are disproportionately experienced among disadvantaged groups and as such, adult social care (ASC) practitioners are well-placed to identify and support affected individuals. There exists no evidence-based ‘introductory’ question for practitioners to identify those at risk of gambling harms, which includes family and friends (‘affected others’). To develop an ‘introductory’ question for use in English ASC, we conducted a scoping review that identified fifteen potential questions. Questions were refined through expert panel review groups (n = 13), cognitive interviewing (n = 18), test–retest reliability checks (n = 20) and validity testing (n = 2,100) against gold-standard measures of problem gambling behaviour. The question development process produced two questions suitable for testing in local authority (LA) ASC departments. These were (i) ‘Do you feel you are affected by any gambling, either your own or someone else’s?’ and (ii) ‘If you or someone close to you gambles, do you feel it is causing you any worries?’ Each had good face validity, strong test–retest reliability, correlated highly with well-being measures and performed reasonably against validated measures of problem gambling. These two questions are currently being piloted by ASC practitioners in three English LAs to assess their feasibility for adoption in practice.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Research for Social Care Programme

Department of Health and Social Care

King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3