Parenting in fear: Child welfare micro strategies of Nigerian parents in Britain

Author:

Okpokiri Cynthia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Education and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK

Abstract

Abstract Parental engagement with British child-rearing normative practices and policies has been a source of conflict between Black African parents and professionals involved in child-safeguarding in Britain. These professionals include teachers, police, healthcare practitioners such as health visitors, nurses and doctors, and most importantly, social workers, because Children Act 1989, section 47 legally tasks social workers to investigate child-safeguarding concerns. Child-rearing norms and practices across all four UK countries are largely similar, although substantive legislative differences necessitate the application of only child welfare laws/policies of England and Wales in this study. This article focuses on Nigerian parents’ experiences of British child welfare system, tensions ensuing from those interactions and how parents mitigate them. Insights are drawn from 25 in-depth semi-structured interviews and two focus group discussions with Nigerian parents living in Greater London. Honneth’s recognition theory and Fraser’s participatory parity undergird the conceptual framework. The findings reveal an interplay of the structural forces of race, power and cultural differentials on participants’ thinking processes and actions. Thus, suggesting that social workers perpetuate the British public’s misrecognition of Nigerian parents through uncritical social work practices, which are implicated in further disempowerment of Black African parents, to the detriment of the families’ well-being.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

ESRC

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health(social science)

Reference44 articles.

1. Wrongs to be righted: The hostile environment for the Windrush generation has wider repercussions;Bain;New Law Journal,2018

2. The discipline controversy revisited;Baumrind;Family Relations,1996

3. Black African children and the child protection system;Bernard;British Journal of Social Work,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3