Managing DNACPR Recommendations in Residential Care: Towards Improved Training for Social Care and Capacity Professionals

Author:

Fitton Emily1ORCID,Kuylen Margot1,Wyllie Aaron2,Michalowski Sabine3ORCID,Bhatt Vivek4,Martin Wayne1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Essex Autonomy Project, School of Philosophy and Art History, University of Essex , Wivenhoe Park , Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK

2. School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex , Wivenhoe Park , Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK

3. School of Law, University of Essex , Wivenhoe Park , Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK

4. School of Law, Utrecht University , Heidelberglaan 8 , Utrecht, 3584 CS, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract The use of ‘Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation’ (DNACPR) recommendations has come under scrutiny during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) has issued a call for new standards, guidance and training. One group for whom new training is required is ‘capacity professionals’ working in and with residential care facilities. These professionals (including Independent Mental Capacity Advocates and Best Interests Assessors) typically have a social work background and have specialist training regarding the 2005 Mental Capacity Act, the provisions of which have a direct relevance to DNACPR recommendations. We report on a survey and focus groups that probed the experiences of this professional group during the pandemic. We recruited 262 participants by approaching civil society organisations in which capacity professionals are well represented; twenty-two participated in follow-on focus groups. We used manifest content analysis and descriptive statistics to analyse the results. Our findings contribute to an emerging picture of what transpired in residential care homes during the first year of the pandemic and help to provide an empirical and normative basis for the development of the new guidance and training for which the CQC has called.

Funder

Arts and Humanities Research Council

UKRI COVID-19 Rapid Response

Ensuring Respect for Human Rights in Locked-Down Care Homes

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health (social science)

Reference31 articles.

1. The Covid-19 pandemic and care homes for older people in Europe – Deaths, damage and violations of human rights;Anand;European Journal of Social Work,2021

2. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis;Bengtsson;NursingPlus Open,2016

3. DNACPR decisions during COVID-19: An empirical and analytical study;Bows;Medical Law Review,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Resuscitation resolutions;Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh;2023-11-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3