Social Workers’ Perceptions of the Nature of Child Neglect: A Systematic Literature Review

Author:

Gibbs Jennifer12ORCID,Coughlan Barry3,Morgan Tessa2,Mikushnica Arbenita4,Phippard Samantha25,Crozier-Roche Francesca2,Drayak Taliah2,Graham David6,Smith Jack2,Duschinsky Robbie2

Affiliation:

1. Young Lives vs Cancer, Social Work Department, Peacock Hall, Royal Victoria Infirmary , Newcastle, NE1 4LP, UK

2. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Applied Social Sciences Group, University of Cambridge , Forvie Site, Robinson Way , Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK

3. Department of Psychology, National College of Ireland , Mayor Street IFSC Dublin 1 , Dublin, D01 K6W2, Ireland

4. South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, St Johns Angell Town Primary School , 2nd Floor, 85 Angell Road , London, SW9 7HH, UK

5. Hampshire County Council, Winchester , UK

6. Care Leavers’ Association , Third Floor, Swan Buildings, 20 Swan Street , Manchester, M4 5JW, UK

Abstract

Abstract Neglect is the most common form of child maltreatment in the UK and the USA. This article reviews research about how child neglect is perceived by social workers. We conducted a systematic review and identified fifty relevant studies, using a range of methodologies, published since the 1989 Children Act. The themes were identified iteratively and synthesised using a narrative method. The review found that despite evidence that neglect is associated with several adverse outcomes, neglect is a lower priority for social work intervention compared to other forms of maltreatment. This is particularly true for emotional neglect and neglect of older children. The review found that social workers conceptualise poverty and neglect as being distinctly different and try to address poverty through practical, non-punitive interventions. However, assessments could better recognise how deprivation exacerbates other risk factors for neglect. The review found a lack of knowledge about perceptions of neglect in adolescents and children with a disability and about the threshold for intervention when neglect is cumulative. Practice may be improved by better recognising and addressing the societal context to neglect allegations and the risk of long-term harm. Achieving this may have resource and training implications.

Funder

National Institute for Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3