A systematic overview of systematic reviews evaluating medication adherence interventions

Author:

Anderson Laura J1,Nuckols Teryl K1,Coles Courtney2,Le Michael M3,Schnipper Jeff L4,Shane Rita5,Jackevicius Cynthia6,Lee Joshua1,Pevnick Joshua M1,Choudhry Niteesh K7,O’Mahony Denis8,Sarkisian Catherine9,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johnathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

3. David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

4. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA

5. Department of Pharmacy, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

6. College of Pharmacy, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Institute for Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and University Health Network, Toronto, Canada

7. Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

8. Department of Medicine (Geriatrics), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

9. Division of Geriatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To systematically summarize evidence from multiple systematic reviews (SRs) examining interventions addressing medication nonadherence and to discern differences in effectiveness by intervention, patient, and study characteristics. Summary MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched for papers published from January 2004 to February 2017. English-language SRs examining benefits of medication adherence interventions were eligible. Inclusion was limited to adult patients prescribed medication for 1 of the following disease conditions: diabetes and prediabetes, heart conditions, hypertension and prehypertension, stroke, and cognitive impairment. Non–disease-specific SRs that considered medication adherence interventions for older adults, adults with chronic illness, and adults with known medication adherence problems were also included. Two researchers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. They then extracted key variables from eligible SRs, reconciling discrepancies via discussion. A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) was used to assess SRs; those with scores below 8 were excluded. Conclusions regarding intervention effectiveness were extracted. Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to assess evidence quality. Results Of 390 SRs, 25 met the inclusion criteria and assessed adherence as a primary outcome. Intervention types most consistently found to be effective were dose simplification, patient education, electronic reminders to patients, and reduced patient cost sharing or incentives. Of 50 conclusions drawn by the SRs, the underlying evidence was low or very low quality for 45 SRs. Conclusion Despite an abundance of primary studies and despite only examining high-quality SRs, the vast majority of primary studies supporting SR authors’ conclusions were of low or very low quality. Nonetheless, health system leaders seeking to improve medication adherence should prioritize interventions that have been studied and found to be effective at improving patient adherence, including dose simplification, education, reminders, and financial incentives.

Funder

ASHP Research and Education Foundation

National Institute on Aging

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Policy,Pharmacology

Cited by 63 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3